The intercultural nature of human rights: the case of China (part two)

Abstract

In the first part of this article the use of wild Wesen of Merleau-Ponty and his story and concept as original nucleus that would serve to inform eidetic formulations of human rights justification stated, whenever you give itself to the essences of features dynamic (core, course, body). Using Estromatología given by Ricardo Sánchez Ortiz de Urbina as metro, we could roll back the level of the wild a Urstiftung possible, where energy territory of essences, whose activity produces passive fragmentations from the surrounding strata appear as reached if different actors had Being torn fragment undivided. In this second part I argue how different cultures can appear as recipients of these different fragments torn or recipients reflections of various aspects of the undivided nucleus of the wild concerning human rights. I suggest the idea that different cultural traditions have torn themselves facets of the human nucleus in the seething one plural interfactuality of unique; and also tested an interpretation of the different Chinese doctrines as faceted expressions of the same core not refined, wild, vertical, before embarking on a second anabasis to the heart of animality.