A backstitch of phenomenological aesthetics

Abstract

The purpose of this entry is to highlight the concern of Marc Richir in his Méditations phénoménologiques, that a Phenomenological Aesthetics was more necessary than ever even when we were moving on any horizon, impossible in fact, as language in search of meaning can sometimes be; but this entry falls within a rather weak parrhesia of language centered on the ancient, where the art, (taking as a reference or beginning Greek tragedies on the level of mimesis, in correspondence with the Einfühlung, phenomenological identification, the identity of the work in tragedies), whether it imitates only with language, or if it speaks of the true creation, the tragedy, it goes beyond the labels of any logos in permanent struggle: tragic, intentional, passionate or transcendental; we do not find any semantic mythology that identifies it in an intentional fence, due to its spontaneous loss, or recovers it in an inchoative aesthetic sense, in a phase, or form that will show or not depending on the light; Plato does not catch it in the Sophist, because it transgresses any conduct, from within and from without, that is, whether it is a passionate dissimulation of the poet, or if we consider it from the Aristotle's framework in the classical artistic closure of tragedy in the experience generated in the spectator as an insufficient aesthetic phenomenon.