Abstract
This article aims at showing a surprising
convergence between two thoughts of the drive
-which at first sight seem to be very different-
:Marc Richir’s (philosopher), and Jean
Laplanche’s (psychoanalyst). In
Phénoménologie et institution symbolique,
published in 1988, Marc Richir distinguishes a
drive (Trieb), rethinks in accordance with
Freud but also against Freud’s conception ,
from a tendance that is not yet a drive. What
Marc Richir calls “pulsion” (drive), born of the
failure of a process of phenomenalisation, has
remarkable points of convergences with Jean
Laplanche’s “pulsion”. Richir and Laplanche
defend a traumatic origin of the drive which is
at the same time a traumatic origin of the ego
(le moi, Ich).

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
