Abstract
The problem of motion is one of the most
important fundaments for the creation of the new
physics. For Leibniz, it was the starting point to
disregard the Cartesian mechanistic philosophy and
to reinstate Aristotle’s notion of entelechia as a
concept that could explain the most intimate
activity of matter. The present paper aims to
analyze the development of the concept of motion
and its relationship to the notion of substance, using
Leibniz’ works under Huygens mentoring to begin,
and moving on to the publication of Leibniz’ works
in which he consolidates the new science of
dynamics.
References
Benítez, L., y Robles J. A. (1997): El problema del infinito: filosofía y matemáticas. México:
UNAM-IIF.
Blanco Laserna, D. (2015): “Luz y ondas. Huygens: la luz como propagación
ondulatoria” en Arbor, 191 (775).
http://arbor.revistas.csic.es/index.php/arbor/article/view/2066/2619
Descartes, R. (1995): Los principios de la filosofía, trad. Guillermo Quintas, Madrid:
Alianza.
Duchesneau François (2012): “The sense of apriori method in Leibniz’ Dynamique”
en G. Brittan (ed.), Causality, Method, and Modality: Essays in Honor of Jules
Vuillemin, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 53- 82.
Duchesneau F. (1989): “Leibniz’s ‘Hypothesis Physica Nova’: A Conjunction of
Models for Explaining Phenomena” en J. R. Brown & J. Mittelstrass (eds.), An
Intimate relation. Studies in the history and philosophy of science, Dordrecht: Reidel,
J
pp. 153-170.
u
l
Gaos, J. (1992): Historia de nuestra idea del mundo, México: FCE, p. 748.
i
o
Gueroutl, Martial (1982): “Space, Point and Void in Leibniz’s Philosophy”, trad.
-
a
g
Roger Ariew en Michael Hooker, Leibniz: Critical and Interpretive Essays,
o
s
t
Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 284-301.
o
Gueroutl, Martial (1967): Leibniz, Dynamique et métaohysique, París: Aubier Montaigne.
Leibniz G. W. (2004): Correspondencia con Arnauld, trad. Guillermo Quintero, Buenos
Aires: Losada.
Leibniz G. W. (1991): Escritos de dinámica, trad. Juan Arana, Madrid: Tecnos.
Leibniz, G. W. (1975): Philosophical Papers and Letters: A Selection, trad. L.E. Loemke, Dorrecht: Springer.
Leibniz G. W. (1875-1890): Die philosophischen Schriften, C.I. Gerhardt (ed.), 7 vols,
Berlín, (reimp. Hildesheim, 1960-61).
Leibniz, G. W. (1872): Mathematische Schriften, Ed. C.I. Gerhardt, 7 vols, Berlín: Hildesheim, 1872.
Leibniz, W. y S. Clarke (1980). La Polémica Leibniz Clarke, trad. Eloy Rada, Madrid: Taurus.
Manchak, John Byron (2009): “On Force in Cartesian Physics” en Philosophy of Science,
, pp. 295-306.
O’Neil, Eileen (1993): “Influxus Physicus” en Steve Nadler (ed.). Causation in Early
Modern Philosophy Cartesianism, Occasionalism, and Preestablished Harmony, University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, pp. 27-56.
Pérez Quintana, A. (2006): “Fuerzas, potencias, tendencias sustancias. Física y metafísica en Leibniz” en Laguna: Revista de Filosofía, 18, pp. 11-34
Ribas, A. (2008): Biografía del vacío, Barcelona: Editorial Sunya, p. 250.
Solbes, Jordi y Francisco Tarín (2008): “Generalizando el concepto de energía y su conservación” en Didáctica de las ciencias experimentales y sociales, 22, pp. 155-180.
Tho, Tzuchien (2017): Vis Vim Vi: Declinations of Force in Leibniz’s Dynamics, Cham: Springer.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2019 Asociación de Filosofía Eikasía