Abstract
This paper proposes the construction of an epistemic ethics that provides principles of just action concerning the epistemic dimension of human subjects. Building on the theoretical framework of epistemic injustice, it seeks to take the first steps toward outlining an epistemic ethics, given the central relevance of the epistemic dimension to human beings. To this is added the digital component, since examining the contemporary context necessarily involves considering the increasing integration of digital technologies into both social and individual spheres. In this regard, the concept of algorithmic discrimination enables an understanding of how digital algorithms reflect the discriminatory logics present in society, affecting subjects in their epistemic dimension. The paper concludes with a call for reflection aimed at elucidating the principles that should guide epistemic ethics.
References
Báez-Vizcaíno, Katherine (2024), «Exploring epistemic injustice: a bibliometric analysis of academic production and its evolution», en Publishing Research Quarterly, vol. 40, pp. 11-29, <https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-023-09972-y>.
Báez-Vizcaíno, Katherine (2023), «Velos en el paisaje del conocimiento: el trato desigual en el reconocimiento, acceso y comunicación del conocimiento como manifestaciones de la injusticia epistémica», en La Barca de Teseo, vol. 1, n.º 1, pp. 35-46, <https://doi.org/10.61780/bdet.v1i1.3>.
Báez-Vizcaíno, Katherine y Santana-Soriano, Esteban (2024), «Pre-transaccional, transaccional y post-transaccional: categorías para reconocer la injusticia epistémica», en Ciencia y Sociedad, vol. 49, n.º 3, pp. 9-32, <https://doi.org/10.22206/cys.2024.v49i3.3235>.
Chu, Chia-Huei; Nyrup, Rune; Leslie, Kim, et al. (2022), «Digital ageism: challenges and opportunities in artificial intelligence for older adults», en The Gerontologist, vol. 62, n.º 7, pp. 947-955, <https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnab167>.
Dotson, Kristie (2012), «A cautionary tale: on limiting epistemic oppression», en Frontiers: a journal of women studies, vol. 33, pp. 24-47, <https://doi.org/10.1353/fro.2012.0008>.
Hendl, Theresa y Jansky, Benedikt (2022), «Tales of self-empowerment through digital health technologies: a closer look at “Femtech”», en Review of Social Economy, vol. 80, n.º 1, pp. 29-57, <https://doi.org/10.1080/00346764.2021.2018027>.
Jordan, Michael I. y Mitchell, Tom M. (2015), «Machine learning: trends, perspectives, and prospects», en Science, vol. 349, n.º 6245, pp. 255-260, <https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa8415>.
Mwambari, David; Ahmed, Faisal y Barak, Chao (2022), «The impact of open access on knowledge production, consumption and dissemination in Kenya’s higher education system», en Third World Quarterly, vol. 43, n.º 6, pp. 1408-1424, <https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2022.2056010>.
Santana-Soriano, Esteban (2024), Inteligencia artificial, cibermundo y educación: reflexiones ontológicas, epistemológicas y éticas desde una perspectiva sistémico-materialista. Tesis doctoral, Universidad del País Vasco, España.
Walmsley, Joyce (2023), «“Computer says no”: artificial intelligence, gender bias, and epistemic injustice», en Feminist philosophy and emerging technologies, pp. 249-263, <https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003275992-16>.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
