Philosophy and Ruralities: Presentation
Portada del número 120 de Eikasía usando el cartel original
pdf (Español (España))

Keywords

ruralidades
pensamiento filosófico
Sociedad Asturiana de Filosofía
congreso Ruralities
Philosophical Thought
Asturian Philosophy Society
Congress

How to Cite

P. Pazos, A. (2024). Philosophy and Ruralities: Presentation. Eikasía Revista De Filosofía, (121), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.57027/eikasia.121.871

Abstract

In contrast to the cultural predominance of the urban and in the midst of a context of unbridled globalizing capitalism, the VIII Congress on Contemporary Philosophical Thought posed the challenge of collecting some voices and discourses often marginalized by the canon of Western metrocentric thought. Throughout those three days in October, in the congress we analyzed in detail the situations of subjects, communities and rural geographies, situations that tend to be actively ignored in a spatial present that finds globalization, the hyper-densification of the main urban-metropolitan areas, and the forced emptying of rural geographies, as one of their conflict frameworks. These analyzes delved into the specific needs of these communities, shedding light on their challenges, and offering a critical perspective on the complexity of the interaction between rural and urban areas.

From these concerns, the VIII Congress was articulated as a platform through which to celebrate the diversity of emerging philosophical discourses produced within the frameworks of what is commonly understood as «rural», recognizing its crucial importance in the construction of a comprehensive dialogue about the challenges that define our present; and this monograph is the result of that exchange of knowledge.

https://doi.org/10.57027/eikasia.121.871
pdf (Español (España))

References

Dussel, Enrique (2004), «“Sistema mundo” y “transmodernidad”», en Dube, Saurabh, Banerjee, Ishita, y Mignolo, Walter (coords.), Modernidades coloniales. México D.F., Colegio de México.

Herrera, María Asunción (2020), Bioética postsecular e interespecífica: ciencia, ética y cultura en el siglo XXI. Madrid, Paidós.

Herrero, Yayo (2016), «Economía feminista y economía ecológica. El diálogo necesario y urgente», en Revista de Economía Crítica, n.º 22, pp. 144-161, <https://revistaeconomiacritica.org/index.php/rec/article/view/114>, [10/03/2024]

Legarreta, Matxalen (2017), «Notas sobre la crisis de los cuidados: distribución social, moralización del tiempo y reciprocidad del tiempo donado en el ámbito doméstico-familiar», en Arbor: Ciencia, Pensamiento y Cultura, vol. 193, n.º 784, <https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2017.784n2004>, [01/03/2024].

MacIntyre, Alisdair (1977), «Epistemological crises, dramatic narrative and philosophy of science», en The Monist, vol. 60, is. 4, pp. 453-472, <https://doi.org/10.5840/monist197760427>, [03/03/2024].

Tafalla, Marta (2022), Filosofía ante la crisis ecológica. Una propuesta de convivencia con las demás especies: decrecimiento, veganismo y rewilding. Madrid, Plaza y Valdés.

Voronkova, Valentina y Puchenko, Oleg (2021), «Philosophy of the geopolitical reformation of the world in the context of modern challenges of globalization», en Humanities Studies. Social philosophy and philosophy of history, 8, pp. 8-19, <https://doi.org/10.26661/hst-2021-8-85-01>, [01/03/2024].

Wallerstein, Immanuel (2011), The Modern World-System I: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. California, University of California Press.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.