Keywords
liberalismo
republicanismo
comunitarismo
derecho
política Jürgen Habermas
Liberalism
Republicanism
Communitarianism
Right
Politics
How to Cite
Abstract
The decomposition of the ethos of conventional societies in Modernity split morality and ethics, but the philosophy of the subject and the metaphysical separation between natural and positive law led to a concurrence between liberalism that founded the human rights of the individual, as a subject in small scale, in rational morality, while republicanism anchored popular sovereignty in a people, as a large-scale subject, who recognizes the ethical values of the community, even in the debate between liberalism and communitarianism in North America. But, the theory of communicative action overcomes this recurring aporia because it enables an intersubjective understanding of law as responsible for the social integration between the communicative rationality of the world of life and the strategic rationality of social systems, politics and the economy, since It simultaneously allows private autonomy and public autonomy so that social agents act for the facticity or validity of the right at the level of legal norms, of the system of rights.
References
Baron, Hans (1955), Crisis of the Early Italian Renaissance. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
Brooks, Thom (2015), «The Capabilities Approach and Political Liberalism», en Thom Brooks y Martha Nussbaum, Rawls’s Political Liberalism. New York, Columbia Univ. Press, pp. 139-174.
Gutmann, Amy (2003), «Justice across the spheres», en David Miller y Michael Walzer, Pluralism, Justice and Equality. Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 99-119.
Habermas, Jürgen (2023), Faktizität und Geltung. Beitrage zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats, 8. Aufl. Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp.
Habermas, Jürgen (2022a), Die Einbeziehung des Anderen. Studien zur politischen Theorie, 5. Aufl. Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp.
Habermas, Jürgen (2022b), Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, 12. Aufl. Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp, 2 v.
Kant, Immanuel (2007), Zum ewigen Frieden, en Akademieausgabe von Immanuel Kants Gesammelten Werken, pp. 341-386, [1795], <http://kant.korpora.org/Inhalt8.html>, [10/10/2023].
Machiavelli, Niccolò (1971), Discorsi sopra la prima decada di Tito Livio. Firenze, Sansoni.
Miller, David (2003), «Introduction», en David Miller y Michael Walzer, Pluralism, Justice and Equality. Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 1-16.
Miller, David y Walzer, Michael (2003), Pluralism, Justice and Equality. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Nussbaum, Martha (2015), «Introduction», en Thom Brooks y Martha Nussbaum, Rawls’s Political Liberalism. New York, Columbia Univ. Press, pp. 1-56.
Pettit, Philip (2002), Republicanism: a theory of freedom and government. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Rawls, John (2005), A theory of justice: Original Edition. Cambridge, Massachusetts/London, England, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Rawls, John (1996), Political Liberalism. New York, Columbia Univ. Press.
Rockefeller, Steven, (1994), «Comment», en Charles Taylor y Amy Gutmann, Multiculturalism and «The politics of recognition». Princeton University Press, pp. 87-98.
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques (2012), Ouvrages de politiques, en Collection complète des oeuvres, vol. 1, Genève, 1780-1789, in-4.º, édition en ligne , version du 7 octobre 2012, <http://www.rousseauonline.ch/Text/volume-1-ouvrages-de-politique.php>, [10/10/2023].
Taylor, Charles (2001), Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge, Massachusetts, Harvard University Press.
Taylor, Charles (1994), «The Politics of Recognition», en Charles Taylor y Amy Gutmann, Multiculturalism and «The politics of recognition». Princeton University Press, pp. 25-74.
Walzer, Michael (2008), Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. New York, Basic Books.
Walzer, Michael (1994), «Comment», en Charles Taylor y Amy Gutmann, Multiculturalism and «The politics of recognition». Princeton University Press, pp. 99-103.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.