Abstract
Whenever an exposition on any doctrinal aspect of the Platonic dialogues begins, it is worth noting that a dialectical relationship must necessarily be established on the content that is going to be transmitted. And this is not a play on words about the exposition of a philosophy that is the prototype of the dialectic proper. No, simply a call to attention is made to the listener to warn him that in what follows he will not find a picture of categorical statements supported by definitions, but rather impulses capable of moving images on three planes at least: one, that of the 4th century Athenian world; another, the one that seems to be built on the plot development of the conversation from which we think to extract philosophy and that in reality what it does is organize our capacity for understanding that follows it; and another, the experience that each individual has and that is incorporated into their way of agreeing to understand and use what they are learning, but not at the level of a conceptual reduction, but rather in such a way as to achieve a world of images that is sufficiently structured and manageable for him to tell the film in his own way.
References
Aspasia de Mileto (1994), Testimonios y discursos (José Solana, ed.). Barcelona, Anthropos.
Aristófanes (1994), Lisístrata (A. López Eire, ed.). Salamanca, Hespérides.
Bravo, Francisco (1994), «La ontología de la definición en El Político de Platón», en Rowe (1994), pp. 76-87.
Brisson, Luc (1982), Platon les mots et les mythes. Paris, Maspero (hay trad. de José M.ª Zamora, Platón, las palabras y los mitos ¿Cómo y por qué dio Platón nombre al mito? Madrid, Abada, 2005).
Brisson, Luc (1994), «Interprétation du Mythe du Politique» en Rowe (1994), pp. 349-364.
Cornford, F. M. (1983), La teoría platónica del conocimiento. Barcelona, Paidós [1935].
Campbell, L. (1867), The Sophistes and Politicus of Plato, with a revised test and English notes. Oxford.
Cavini, W. (1994), «Naming and Argument: Diaeretic Logic in Plato’s Statesman», en Rowe (1994), pp. 123-139.
Detienne, Marcel (1985), La invención de la mitología. Barcelona, Península [1981].
Friedländer, Paul (1960), Platon. Die platonischen Schriften, t. III. Berlin.
Goldschmidt, V. (1947), Le paradigme dans la dialectique platonicienne. Paris.
González Escudero, Santiago (2001), «Los símiles de la comunicación humana en Platón», en J. Velarde, J. A. López Cerezo, J. A. de la Pienda (eds.), Studia Philosophica II. Oviedo, pp. 249-269.
Gosling, J. C. B. (1993), Platón. México, UNAM [1973].
Guthrie, W. K. C. (1992), Historia de la filosofía griega, tomo V. Madrid, Gredos [1978].
Kahn, Charles A. (1994), «The place of the Statesman in Plato’s later work», en Ch. Rowe (1994), pp.49-63.
Kato, Shinro (1994), «Imitation and Likeness», en Rowe (1994), pp. 162-172.
Kucharsky, Paul (1949), Les Chemins du Savoir dans les derniers dialogues de Platon. Paris, PUF.
Plato (1952), Statesman (J. B. Skemp, ed.). London, Routeledge.
Puster, Rolf W. (1983), Zur Argumentationsstruktur Platonischer Dialoge. Freiburg-München.
Reale, Giovanni [1991], Per una nuova interpretazione di Platone, 10.ª ed. Milano (hay trad.: Por una nueva interpretación de Platón. Madrid, Herder 2003).
Rosen, Stanley (1983), Plato’s Sophist. The Drama of Original and Image. New Haven/London, Yale University Press.
Rowe, Ch. J. (1994), Reading the Statesman. Proceedings of the III Symposium Platonicum. Academia Verlag.
Ryle, G. (1960), «Letters and Syllables in Plato», en Philosophical Review 69, pp.431-451.
Schuhl, Pierre-Maxime (1968), La Fabulation Platonicienne. Paris, Vrin.
Szlezák, Th. A. 1997), Leer a Platón. Madrid, Alianza, [1991].
Wilamowitz-Möllendorf, U. von (1919), Platon, II vol. Berlin, Weidmann.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.