Abstract
This is a contribution to a new doctrine I have called a rethought comprehensive naturalism. The essay is oriented by these four theses: (I) Being-‐‑in-‐‑potency is essential to the explanatory power of this doctrine because of its key function in understanding the continuity of the causal process which generates beings. (II) Only exists in potency what will be in act. (III) The modern notion of field is appropriate to reinterpret the concept of being-‐‑in-‐‑potency. Lastly (IV) there are several, more or less conscious, contemporary attempts at reinterpreting being-‐‑in-‐‑potency which bear witness to its indispensability.
References
Aristóteles, Física, edición francesa traducida por Henri Carteron, Les Belles Lettres, París, 1990. Aristóteles, Metafísica, edición francesa traducida por J. Tricot, Vrin, París, 1986.
Aristóteles, De Generatione et Corruptione, edición francesa traducida por J. Tricot, Vrin, París, 2005. Ivor Leclerc, The Nature of Physical Existence, George Allen & Unwin Ltd, Londres, 1972.
Émile Meyerson, De l’explication dans les sciences, Payot, París, 1927.
Joseph Needham, Order of Life, Yale, 1936.
Andrew G. Van Melsen, The Philosophy of Nature, E. Nauwelaerts, Lovaina, 1954.
René Thom, Esquisse d’une sémiophysique, París, Inter Éditions, 1988.
Conrad H. Waddington, How Animals Develop, George Allen & Unwin Ltd., Londres, 1946. Sarah Waterlow, Nature, Change, and Agency in Aristotle’s Physics, Oxford U. P., 1982. Alfred North Whitehead, Process and Reality, The Macmillan Company, 1929.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
