Aproximaciones richirianas a la fenomenología del lenguaje
PDF (Español (España))

Keywords

Richir
fenómeno
fenomenología
fenomenalidad
lenguaje
lengua
fuera de lenguaje
tiempo
temporalidad
temporalización
presencia
retención
protención
sentido
signo
significación
esquematismo
reflexividad
Wesen
polisemia
significante
significado
gramatología
diferancia
diseminación
lo simbólico
institución simbólica
logos
apofántico
Husserl
Heidegger
Derrida
Lacan Richir
Husserl
Heidegger
Derrida
Lacan
phenomenon
phenomenology
phenomenality
language
speech
out of language
linguistics
time
temporality
temporalisation
presence
retention
protention
sense
sign
meaning
schematism
reflexivity
Wesen
polysemy
signifier
signified
grammatology
différance
dissemination
Symbolic
symbolic institution
logos
apophantic Richir
Husserl
Heidegger
Derrida
Lacan
Wesen
logos
phénomène
phénoménologie
phénoménalité
langage
langue
hors-‐‑langage
linguistique
temps
temporalité
temporalisation
présence
rétention
protention
sens
signe
signification
schématisme
réflexivité
polysémie
signifiant
signifié
grammatologie
différance
dissémination
symbolique
institution symbolique
apophantique

How to Cite

Carlson, S., & Arozamena, A. (2026). Aproximaciones richirianas a la fenomenología del lenguaje . Eikasía Revista De Filosofía, (47), 363–388. https://doi.org/10.57027/eikasia.47.2108

Abstract

This article studies the specificity of the phenomenological analysis of the language which Marc Richir develops in one of his main works, Méditations phénoménologiques (1992). At first, we shall propose a global approach of the question, by showing that the richirienne approach deviates at the same time from the classic phenomenology and from the linguistics. Secondly, we shall try to follow the richirienne thought in certain important passages of Méditations, by showing that the analysis deploys according to several fragmented, but complementary and crossed approaches. We shall also show that these various approaches testify of a diversity of interlocutors or opponents, more or less good identified: not only Husserl, Heidegger or Merleau-‐‑Ponty but also, and in a more unsuspected way, Lacan or Derrida.

https://doi.org/10.57027/eikasia.47.2108
PDF (Español (España))
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Eikasia Filosofia

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.