Abstract
In this paper I comment the philosophical anthropology
contained in Sloterdijk’s Rules for the Human Zoo as a
particular derivative of contemporary anthropological
pessimism. My aim is then to criticize the anthropological
vein of this work using arguments already deployed against
the general paradigm that operates as framework of the
Rules. The target of the criticism is a philosophically and
scientifically very controversial theory of humanity that
usually performs the task of legitimating the actual society
by attributing biological origins to existing evils.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2013 Asociacion de Filosofía Eikasía
