On the relationship between narrative explanations and experimental models in geology
pdf (Español (España))

Keywords

geología
ciencia histórica
modelos experimentales geology
historical science
experimental models

How to Cite

Baena, J., Suárez Pascual, D., & Cabrera Machado, B. M. (2026). On the relationship between narrative explanations and experimental models in geology. Eikasía Revista De Filosofía, (134), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.57027/eikasia.134.1288

Abstract

Geology is a science that uniquely integrates approaches from both the historical and experimental natural sciences. Despite its diverse nature, this field has not been sufficiently explored within the philosophy of science, particularly regarding its epistemic value and explanatory structure as a historical science. Historically, experimental research has been employed in geology to validate theories explaining remote phenomena. This paper analyzes forms of explanation in geology from the narrative (storytelling) perspective, emphasizing coherence, the use of models, and productive speculation. It also evaluates the epistemic character of explanations derived from experimental models, discussing the relationship between these two modes of explanation and the epistemic value they offer for addressing new challenges in the production of knowledge within the Earth sciences.

https://doi.org/10.57027/eikasia.134.1288
pdf (Español (España))

References

Carbone, G., & Frodeman, R. (2017), «On the epistemic value of narrative in geology», Zygon: Journal of Religion & Science, 52(1), 164-184.

Cleland, C. (2002), «Methodological and epistemic differences between historical science and experimental science», Philosophy of Science, 69(3), 474-496.

Frodeman, R. (1995). «Geological reasoning: Geology as an interpretive and historical science», Geological Society of America Bulletin, 107(8), 960-968.

Goudge, T. A. (1958). «The appeal to common sense», The Philosophical Review, 67(4), 540-554.

Gould, S. J. (1987). Time's arrow, time's cycle: Myth and metaphor in the discovery of geological time. Harvard University Press.

Kleinhans, M. G., Buscombe, D., Civitarese, G., van der Vegt, M., & van der Wal, D. (2018), «Experimental modelling of sedimentary systems», en Treatise on Geomorphology, 12: Sediment Transport and Depositional Processes (pp. 1-28). Elsevier.

Paola, C. (2000), «Quantitative models of sedimentary basin filling», Sedimentology, 47(S1), 121-178.

Popper, K. R. (1959), The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Hutchinson.

van Heijst, M. W. I. M., & Postma, G. (2001), Fluvial response to sea-level changes: a quantitative analogue, experimental approach. Basin Research, 13, 269-292.

Whewell, W. (1858), History of Scientific Ideas, being the First Part of the Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences. 3rd ed., vol. 2. John S. Parker.

Whewell, W. (1872), History of the Inductive Sciences from the Earliest to the Present Time. 3rd ed., 2 vols. D. Appleton.

Windelband, W. (1980), «Rectorial address, strasbourg, 1894», History and Theory, 19(2), 169-185. (Obra original publicada en 1894).

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.