Citizen participation and artificial intelligence in the management of health risks
pdf (Español (España))

Keywords

inteligencia artificial
riesgos sanitarios
compromiso del paciente artificial intelligence
healthcare risks
patient engagement

How to Cite

Rivas-Carrero, A. (2026). Citizen participation and artificial intelligence in the management of health risks. Eikasía Revista De Filosofía, (134), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.57027/eikasia.134.1280

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into contemporary medicine has redefined the field of healthcare risk management, presenting both unique opportunities and specific limitations. This paper explores the fundamental role of patient engagement in the identification, assessment, and mitigation of health risks in the age of AI. From an epistemological perspective, it highlights the capacity of citizens to detect emerging risks and contribute valuable experiences that enrich decision-making processes. On the axiological level, it examines the limitations of AI in incorporating ethical and cultural values, emphasizing the importance of prudence, deliberation, and adaptation to diverse contexts—areas in which technology still cannot replace human sensitivity. Finally, from a praxeological standpoint, the paper analyzes both the strengths of AI in empowering patients and its philosophical and technical limitations, particularly regarding the holistic understanding of the patient’s condition. The study concludes that risk management in the digital era requires a balanced integration between technology and citizen participation.

https://doi.org/10.57027/eikasia.134.1280
pdf (Español (España))

References

Beck, U. (2002). La sociedad del riesgo: hacia una nueva modernidad. Paidós Ibérica. Publicado originalmente en 1986.

Frickel, S., & Vincent, M. B. (2007). Hurricane Katrina, contamination, and the unintended organization of ignorance. Technology in Society, 29(2), 181-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2007.01.007

Funtowicz, S. & Ravetz, J. (1993). Science for the post-normal age. Futures, 25(7), 739- 755.

González García, M.,I., López Cerezo, J.,A., Luján, J.,L., & de Melo Martín, M.ª I. (1994). Las concepciones de la tecnología. Arbor, 149(585), 125-145. Recuperado de https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/las-concepciones-de-la-tecnología/docview/1301393118/se-2

Huxley, A. (1932). Brave new world. Vintage.

Long, L. N., & Cotner, C. F. (2019). A Review and Proposed Framework for Artificial General Intelligence. 2019 IEEE Aerospace Conference, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1109/aero.2019.8742125

Searle, J. R. (1980). Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(3), 417-424. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005756

Spearman, C. (1904). «General Intelligence», Objectively Determined and Measured. The American Journal of Psychology, 15(2), 201. https://doi.org/10.2307/1412107

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.